MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Where Credit Is Due: A Timeline of the Mortgage Crisis

News: A field guide to the loan sharks and politicos who got us into the predatory lending mess

July/August 2008 Issue

1913: Federal Reserve Act creates national banking system.

1914: Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair or deceptive business practices.

1933: With memories of 1929 stock crash still fresh, Glass-Steagall Act separates "commercial banks" focusing on consumer activities (checking, savings) from "investment banks," which deal with speculative trading and mergers.

1968: Truth in Lending Act requires banks to disclose loan terms & fees.

1970: Bank Holding Company Act Amendments first step toward weakening Glass-Steagall; allow commercial banks, via holding companies, to both accept deposits and make commercial loans.

1978: Supreme Court's Marquette decision gives banks the right to make loans in states other than where they are headquartered; lenders rush to places with the weakest consumer protections, e.g. Delaware and South Dakota.

1980: After interest rates rise 13 percentage points in 2 years, President Carter signs law further hollowing out Glass-Steagall. The measure—pushed through by Sen. Jake Garn (R-Utah), a former insurance executive—demolishes usury caps for mortgages and raises bar for prosecuting lenders.

Jan 1981: Sen. Garn becomes chair of Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee with fellow deregulation advocate M. Danny Wall as majority staff director. American Banker exults that "lobbyists here view Mr. Wall's promotion as a gift swept to shore by the [gop] tide last election day."

1982: Sen. Garn coauthors Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act, which deregulates savings and loan industry.

1984: S&Ls start crashing in Texas as oil boom peters out. More than 1,000 thrifts nationwide will fail between 1986 and 1995; debacle will cost $500 billion, including $124 billion in taxpayer money.

April 2, 1987: Sen. John McCain meets with federal regulators to discuss investigation of Lincoln Savings and Loan. The thrift's owner, Charles Keating, was the senator's business partner and campaign contributor, and flew McCain around on his private jet.

Sept: Drexel Burnham Lambert, home to "junk-bond king" Michael Milken, creates "collateralized debt obligations" (cdos)—securities made up of myriad loans and bonds with different risk levels.

Dec 9, 1988: Silverado S&L collapses, leaving $1.3 billion taxpayer liability; board members include Neil Bush, who engineered loans to friends in what federal Office of Thrift Supervision will call "multiple conflicts of interest." Bush later tells Congress a few of his deals may have looked "a little fishy."

Feb 6, 1989: President George H.W. Bush bails out S&L industry; among those helped is his son, Jeb, as government takes over most of a $5 million second mortgage on his Miami office building.

Sept 30, 1995: Congress enacts Truth in Lending Act "reform," easing regulations on creditors; bill powered through by Rep. Bill McCollum (R-Fla.), a key recipient of finance, insurance, and real estate (fire) donations ($136,000 in 1993-94).

Dec 22: As part of Newt Gingrich's Contract With America, Congress enacts a measure making it more difficult to sue companies for securities fraud.

Aug 2, 1996: Office of Thrift Supervision issues rule preempting almost all state laws regulating S&L credit activities.

1997-1998: fire sector spends more than $200 million on lobbying and $150 million on political donations; top agenda items include repealing Glass-Steagall to facilitate mergers.

March 4, 1998: First Union acquires The Money Store, nation's 5th-largest subprime lender (and home to ex-Yankee broadcaster Phil Rizzuto's commercials).

April 1998: Citicorp and Travelers announce biggest-ever corporate merger ($70 billion); transaction technically illegal under Glass-Steagall; ceo Sandy Weill launches $12 million campaign to repeal law.

June 1998: Conseco purchases mobile home lender turned subprime powerhouse Green Tree in $6 billion deal.

July 1999: North Carolina General Assembly bucks deregulation trend, passing landmark measure to curb predatory lending.

Nov 1999: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act guts Glass-Steagall, setting off wave of megamergers among banks and insurance and securities companies. Driving force is Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), who has received $4.6 million from fire sector over previous decade.

June 20, 2000: Treasury and hud urge Fed to investigate subprime units of major banks. No Fed action follows.

June 26: First Union closes The Money Store, takes $2.8 billion write-down.

Dec 14: As Congress heads for Christmas recess, Sen. Gramm attaches 262-page amendment to an omnibus appropriations bill. Commodity Futures Modernization Act will deregulate derivatives trading, give rise to Enron debacle, and open door to an explosion in new, unregulated securities.

Dec 27: American Homeownership and Economic Opportunity Act makes it harder for consumers to get out of lender-required insurance. National Association of Realtors lobbies hard for it, spending $9 million, plus $4 million in contributions.

March 6, 2001: ftc sues Citigroup and its subsidiary Associates, nation's 2nd-largest subprime originator, charging "systematic abusive lending practices" involving 2 million borrowers; 18 months later Citigroup settles for a paltry $215 million.

April 6: Fed chair Alan Greenspan signals concern with "abusive lending practices that target vulnerable segments of the population and can result in unaffordable payments, equity stripping, and foreclosure."

July 27: "'Predatory' is really a high-profile word with no definition," Ameriquest chairman Stephen W. Prough tells Congress, urging rollback of subprime regulations.

April 22, 2002: Georgia's new anti-predatory law signed; Ameriquest helps lead campaign against it and announces that it won't do business in Georgia until law is changed. Standard & Poor's refuses to rate Georgia mortgage securities, choking credit supply to state's home buyers; law gutted within a year.

Oct 7: Swiss investment bank ubs announces that Sen. Gramm is joining it to "advise clients on corporate finance issues and strategy"; he will also lobby Congress, Treasury, and Fed on banking and mortgage issues as industry pushes to eliminate predatory-lending rules.

Dec 18: Conseco files for bankruptcy, mostly due to its purchase of subprime lender Green Tree. In all, 13 banks have failed during 2002—most, according to a Fed report, because of bad loans and "improper accounting related to the securitizing of assets."

March 2003: hsbc acquires Household Finance, nation's 4th-largest subprime lender.

May 1: New Jersey's anti-predatory-lending law signed. Again, Ameriquest and other lenders launch campaign to kill it and Standard & Poor's says it won't rate certain New Jersey securities; law gutted within a year.

2004: Ameriquest employees give total of $200,000 to Bush campaign; founder Roland Arnall and wife Dawn give more than $5 million to pro-Bush pacs. Arnall later appointed ambassador to Netherlands.

Jan 7, 2004: Federal Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issues final rule to preempt states from applying most of their credit laws to national banks and their subsidiaries.

March 2005: Rep. Robert Ney (R-Ohio)—who will later go to prison on corruption charges related to Abramoff scandal—introduces Responsible Lending Act, billed as an anti-predatory-lending measure but in fact designed to preempt stronger state laws. Key supporters include New Century Financial, nation's 2nd-largest subprime lender, which has contributed nearly $50,000 to Ney's campaign. Consumer advocates call it "Loan Shark Protection Act."

April: Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act makes it far harder for consumers (but not businesses) to discharge debts. Chief sponsor, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), has received $2 million-plus from fire sector since 1989.

Sept 1: As housing bubble begins to deflate, administration economist Patrick Lawler announces, "There is no evidence here of prices topping out. On the contrary, house price inflation continues to accelerate."

Sept 22: Illinois Supreme Court hands mortgage lenders a victory, blowing away a 3% cap on fees for loans with more than 8% interest.

Jan 23, 2006: Ameriquest settles 49-state investigation into deceptive subprime practices for $325 million.

April 27: Fed chairman Ben Bernanke acknowledges "signs of softening" in housing market, but says a "sharp slowdown" unlikely.

July 10: Henry M. Paulson Jr. sworn in as Treasury secretary, leaving job as Goldman Sachs chairman and ceo. In 2005, Goldman securitized $68 billion in residential mortgages and $23 billion in "other assets" primarily related to cdos.

Jan 2, 2007: Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) assumes chairmanship of House Financial Services Committee. fire sector tops his list of contributors, with total of $746,000 for 2005-06 cycle.

Jan 29: Paulson tells Congress, "One of the pleasant surprises I had coming to government has been the strong economy we have today."

Feb 22: hsbc's head of mortgage-lending business resigns. Its losses reach $10.5 billion.

Feb 28: Bernanke tells House Budget Committee the housing sector "is a concern, but at this point we don't see it as being a broad financial concern or a major factor in assessing the course of the economy."

Feb 28: New-home sales reported down 20.1% from previous year.

March 12: Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign announces that Sen. Gramm will join it as cochair and economic policy adviser.

April 2: Subprime giant New Century Financial files for Chapter 11 after being forced to repurchase billions of dollars of bad loans.

May 3: ubs shuts down Dillon Read Capital Management, its US subprime arm. GM's finance unit announces deep losses on subprime mortgages. sec task force begins meeting to examine Wall Street's handling of subprime loans.

June 9: In Wall Street Journal interview, former Fed governor Edward Gramlich accuses Greenspan of blocking a 2000 proposal to increase scrutiny of subprime lenders. Greenspan responds there are "a very large number of small institutions, some on the margin of scrupulousness and very hard to detect when they are doing something wrong."

July 16: Jim Cramer, host of cnbc's Mad Money, says the subprime "lending thing" is "completely meaningless...It has no relevance whatsoever." Less than 3 weeks later, Cramer will have meltdown on air, pleading with Fed to cut rates and save Wall Street.

July 19-20: In congressional testimony, Bernanke cuts growth forecasts for 2007 and 2008, blaming problems in housing market; warns that subprime crisis could cost up to $100 billion.

Aug 6: American Home Mortgage, one of the largest US independent home-loan providers, files for Chapter 11.

Aug 16: Countrywide, biggest US mortgage lender, narrowly avoids bankruptcy by taking out emergency $11.5 billion loan.

Aug 31: Ameriquest goes out of business.

Sept 14: Rep. Barney Frank in Boston Globe: Mortgage crisis "was in large part a natural experiment on the role of regulation." Sept 20: Treasury secretary Paulson tells House Financial Services Committee that "fundamental reappraisals in the pricing and appetite of risk have taken place numerous times...We are in the process of another such reappraisal."

Sept 30: ubs announces 3rd-quarter losses of $690 million.

Jan 2008: Number of homes facing foreclosure up 57% compared to same month of previous year. US unemployment rises sharply.

Jan 10: Cleveland files lawsuit against numerous financial institutions alleging that their activities in connection with securitization of subprime mortgages created a "public nuisance." (Litigation still pending.)

Jan 15: Citigroup reports $9.8 billion loss for 4th quarter and writes down $18 billion in subprime losses.

Jan 22 & 30: Fed makes biggest rate cut in 25 years—1.25 percentage points, to 3%.

Feb 6: Longest period of decline in nationwide house prices since 1990.

March 7: Former bosses of Merrill Lynch, Countrywide, and Citigroup questioned by a congressional panel about the $460 million in compensation they received between them during 5 years of subprime boom.

March 16: Bear Stearns announces takeover by JPMorgan Chase in Fed-engineered bailout; measure approved by Fed Board of Governors with fewer votes than required by law, under a post-9/11 "national security emergency" exception.

March 25: In speech on housing market, Sen. McCain calls for easing crisis by "removing regulatory, accounting, and tax impediments to raising capital."

April 18: Jerry Bowyer, chief economist for financial services firm Benchmark, says in New York Sun op-ed that fault for subprime crisis "lies with the small army of hard-left political hustlers who spent the early 1990s pushing risky mortgages on home lenders. And the fault lies especially with the legislators that gave them the power to do it."

April 29: Foreclosure activity reported up 112% from first quarter of 2007.

May 6: Bush announces he will veto legislation directing $15 billion to neighborhoods ransacked by foreclosures. Also threatens to veto legislation to provide $300 billion for struggling homeowners (and force lenders to renegotiate some mortgages) because it would be a "burdensome bailout" that "opens taxpayers to too much risk."


Mother Jones writer Nomi Prins has worked at Goldman Sachs and Bear Stearns.

Research assistance by Sara Abbas and Megan Kiefer


TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google





 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

I will never sign mortgage papers, so long as I may live. Rental agreement? Ok, but mortgage? Forget it. Let someone else deal with jacked-up property values, and all the joy that surrounds the rest of this mortgage-backed flashpaper sunshine story. The blank-hats that run this roulette table have their foot on the brake, and no one's been by to check out the house in a long, long time. Better to live under a piece of canvas than a Countrywide-financed roof, by far.
Posted by:BertJuly 3, 2008 6:16:59 AMRespond ^
Barney Frank isn't a Senator, he is the rep from MA district 4....
Posted by:just sayin'July 3, 2008 8:23:23 PMRespond ^
The Barney Frank reference has been fixed.
Posted by:Mother JonesJuly 7, 2008 9:58:35 AMRespond ^
Has anyone heard whether Fifth-Third has filed bankruptcy yet? I had to take out $10,000 in equity to pay med.bills. I've never been late, locked it in at 5.6% (they've tried like hell to get me to take out more--no can do!), and now they're nicked and diming me to death! Called on July 3rd at 6:00 PM (!) (al bankd lcos3ed for the weknd!)and said my payment (sent June 3rd)hadnt arrived and they had to take it out of my Key aBank checking--I did it, they charged me fees, it stil isnt posted and I'm referred to COLLECTIONS! I've seen this before---when the Savings and Loans crashed--they started charging fees for EVERYTHING! They tried to get more today--beware! And dont count on Congres to do [deleted] about this, or the bannkruptcy laws---OR Obama--he says its a "moral hazard"....nice.
Posted by:KDelphiJuly 7, 2008 1:27:49 PMRespond ^
This is the single most useful piece I've seen on the roots of this crisis. Hooray for Nomi Prins for making this wriggling pile of spaghetti comprehensible!
Posted by:westomoonJuly 7, 2008 1:29:32 PMRespond ^
KDelphi, one thing I can recommend when dealing with a mortgage company is automatic payment. When you've given their computers access to your checking account, any screwup (except NSF) is their fault -- and there don't seem to be many screwups. I know, giving them access is a very uncomfortable step to take -- but it takes your account out of the game they're playing these days. Great for those unnannounced mergers and changes in processors too -- the burden moves off of you and onto them.
Posted by:westomoonJuly 7, 2008 1:35:35 PMRespond ^
Please excuse me if I come up smug. I am a Canadian. I also am a home owner, several as a matter of fact. My principal residence is fully paid up. After 40 years of working life, that portion of my assets will never have mortgage. The other investments all have mortgage with at least 25% down payment and a personal rule that rental income must cover all costs. I some cases I had to greater down payment. Canadian banks will not look at any proposal if it has a minimum of 25% down. They also watch how many investments one has. Here in Ontario we do not expect California style increase in real estate prices. I am content with 5 -9% increase. Thus the crisis is brought about by greed of borrower, lender, international bank. Now it is on the lap of US tax payer.

Having been born in 3rd world, I am appalled that American poor (by which I mean not financially fit to carry large mortgage) can obtain hundreds of thousands dollar worth of credit, but some one with same financial worth in 3rd world will not be able to get $50 from same international bankers.

Posted by:ShahJuly 7, 2008 1:41:12 PMRespond ^
i agree ,...greed all the way around,inflated housing cost, developers , realtors,contractors, and speculators and lenders all had a hand in this, there needs to be a 25% melt down, the sooner the better, goverment needs to stay out of this, and not lock in these inflated housing cost,..i know its sad and its tough , but it is the greed and the louer of easy money that busted this,...this is worse than most people imagine,..foreclosurers and bank failures are the name of the game now
Posted by:rickoJuly 7, 2008 3:06:06 PMRespond ^
I agree with Canadian--but, that's not mostly , what happened here! I HAD to take out an equity loan or die! (Med. bills---Canadians dont have that) It's "trickled down" (puke) to people who got loand for "legit." reasons (well, its ridiculous we have to farm out houses to pay med. bills), locked it in early, and made payments on time. Other people (like my distant mother-in-law) were LIED to! Countrywide....Canada would NEVER let these "corp" exist. Or else, they've changed for hte worse since I lived in Detroit.
Posted by:KDelphiJuly 7, 2008 3:53:41 PMRespond ^
I hear what youre saying about letting them take the $$ out---I guess I have to. I just dont trust them. What if they go bankruopt? Thanks, though
Posted by:KDelphiJuly 7, 2008 3:55:03 PMRespond ^
I love Canadians (well, not all of them..) But, in the land of make believe, (US) you can do absolutely nothing wrong and still end up on the streets and hungry and DIE. Even if you're a vet--maybe ESP. if yu are.So, yeah, Canada , it sounds smug (lol)--unless I can come live upt here. If I had med. care--my house was PAID FOR!
Posted by:KDelphiJuly 7, 2008 3:57:49 PMRespond ^
So John McCain has Sen. Gramm as co chair, and economic policy adviser. Gramm is as crooked as a dog's hind leg so McCain's gotta be suss too. That leaves the black fellow.
Posted by:dedsetmadJuly 7, 2008 5:25:18 PMRespond ^
Big business always screams for de-regulation so no one will watch them while they cheat, and then the bubble bursts. Put them in jail where they belong. They are nothing but two-bit crooks.
Posted by:Frank LibbonJuly 7, 2008 10:00:27 PMRespond ^
I just discovered this article and your site. I am speechless in admiration. Check out my blog on the situation in the UK on http://uneviedematelot.livejournal.com/ if you are interested.
Keep up the amazing work.
Posted by:Russell CavanaghJuly 8, 2008 3:01:03 PMRespond ^
Shah .... lucky you ...
Posted by:Russell CavanaghJuly 8, 2008 3:04:07 PMRespond ^
The lesson Ms. Prins's outstanding article is clear: the cause of both the subprime crisis and the earlier savings and loan crisis can be summed up in one word: deregulation. And John McCain wants even more of it! Stanford professor David Kennedy's excellent history of the 1930's and 40's was titled "Freedom From Fear." By that he means that the regulations passed during and after (up to 1970) the Roosevelt era were intended to -- and DID! -- assure people that the Great Depression would not happen again, at least not for the same reasons. Starting in 1970 many of those regulations have been abolished, and here we are.
Posted by:dsTrekkerJuly 9, 2008 10:36:16 AMRespond ^
That really sums it up!
Posted by:GrantusJuly 9, 2008 10:52:22 AMRespond ^
I saw Nomi Prins on Democracynow.org today. Between her and david corn they did an excellent job describing not just the mortgage crisis, but who the key players in DC were that got the ball rolling for wall street to run us into this mess.
Posted by:gopsux.comJuly 9, 2008 1:20:09 PMRespond ^
while housing prices need to cool, I'm not sure we should let the economic markets handle this mess. It would mean many homeless families that the taxpayer would need to help. The federal gov't won't do [deleted]e about it, so it's up to the states to cough up the assistance. That means higher property and state income taxes.

Instead of a major cool down on housing prices we need to see a cool down on business real estate. So far that has yet to take a hit. In fact if anything speculation on business real estate is going up.
Posted by:gopsux.comJuly 9, 2008 1:27:38 PMRespond ^
Shah-I'll share something with you on how to obtain hundreds of thousands dollar worth of credit from Mortgage company's. Just lie and commit fraud on your mortgage application. It works great and than go spend it on clothes and a fancy car because i deserve it. The kind of," I deserve it" arrogance in this country's as if it were a birth right. Now its not working and I'm going broke, which leads to the next step of blame it on the lenders, real estate agents, etc. which some participated in doing this as well. But who signed the bottom line of the real estate deal? The buyer/borrower. Its hard to stop this kind of thing when half of America is involved! I'll end on this favorite of mine, If you want to be a pig! Remember, pigs get slaughtered!
Posted by:cherry200July 9, 2008 5:07:09 PMRespond ^
Yup.

Deregulation did it.

Now the Txpayers pick up the pieces,
if we can.

When are we gonna' learn----
DEREGULATION IS A SCAM!!
Posted by:niktoJuly 9, 2008 10:34:56 PMRespond ^
The timeline is great but it may be missing one item.
Acording to this web site
On February 5, 2003 the Bush Administration demanded that OFHEO Director Armando Falcon submit his resignation (because of outrage at J.P. Morgan Chase).
The firing came one day after the release of this report:
SYSTEMIC RISK: FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC AND THE ROLE OF OFHEO

The OFHEO report discusses the risks to the financial system posed by derivatives-not simply the derivatives held by Fannie and Freddie, but the unregulated mountain of derivatives contracts in general.

You can find the pdf version of the report here:

Or the HTML version here:


In this July 2003 web page you get some reporting on Freddie Mac, derivatives, and congressional hearings like:
Fannie Mae reported Tuesday a 25 percent drop in its second-quarter earnings caused by changes in the value of derivatives contracts, even though its business expanded significantly.
Posted by:tktvrJuly 10, 2008 6:03:56 AMRespond ^
I messed up, so here it is again.

The timeline is great but it may be missing one item.
Acording to this web site (http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3010ofheo_rpt.html)
On February 5, 2003 the Bush Administration demanded that OFHEO Director Armando Falcon submit his resignation (because of outrage at J.P. Morgan Chase).
The firing came one day after the release of this report:
SYSTEMIC RISK: FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC AND THE ROLE OF OFHEO

The OFHEO report discusses the risks to the financial system posed by derivatives-not simply the derivatives held by Fannie and Freddie, but the unregulated mountain of derivatives contracts in general.

You can find the pdf version of the report here:
(http://web.archive.org/web/*/http: //www.ofheo.gov/docs/reports/sysrisk.pdf)
Or the HTML version here:
(http://209.85.141.104/search? q=cache:YSC_lsndVaQJ:www.ofheo .gov/media/archive/docs/reports/sysrisk.pdf)

In this July 2003 web page (http://web.archive.org/web/2003071 8092629/http://www.moneyfiles.org/housingcrash2.html) you get some reporting on Freddie Mac, derivatives, and congressional hearings like:
Fannie Mae reported Tuesday a 25 percent drop in its second-quarter earnings caused by changes in the value of derivatives contracts, even though its business expanded significantly.
Posted by:tktvrJuly 10, 2008 6:06:43 AMRespond ^
This is from the first page of the web site listed above:
(http://web.archive.org/web/2003080 5171733/www.moneyfiles.org/housingcrash.html)
From the WPOST: Thursday, February 6, 2003; Page E03
The White House...said Armando Falcon Jr., head of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, was asked by administration officials for his resignation Tuesday morning. That was just hours before Falcon released the report.
and further down:
The report also presents a scenario in which one of the mortgage giants suffers large losses, which then spiral into a far-reaching financial crisis.
and further down:
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have also helped pay for the purchase, renovation and upkeep of the headquarters for the Democratic and Republican Parties in Washington. Since 1999, PoliticalMoneyLine says, Fannie Mae has contributed over $2.5 million to house the parties' national and campaign committees, while Freddie Mac has contributed more than $6 million.
Posted by:tktvrJuly 10, 2008 7:03:03 AMRespond ^
Don't borrowers who lied about their income, and falsified their mortgage application, bear some of the responsibility, if they are then later unable to pay the mortgage ?
If the government failed us during the real estate bubble, which was plain for many to see, it was not to warn us that the economy is cyclical. Nobody can explain it fully, but everybody knows instinctively that things go up and down in life. The economy is now going through a down phase. The bubble burst. In a similar way, the stock market bubble burst in March, 2000. Unfortunately, most people lacked the education to see that inevitably bubbles burst.
Various smaller mortgage companies have gone bust, but so far no big bank has gone bust. It's an election year.
Of course, some politician buttered their own bread, as the bubble was inflating. This is what politicians do.
If the government now starts to buy banks as they start to fail, instead of letting them fail, then this will just encourage excess risk-taking by the big banks, since they will then assume that the government will buy the bank, if it ever starts to fail. The real cost of buying failing big banks is inflation.
Foreclosures did not begin in the last two years. If you live beyond your means, as many have done, on credit cards and borrowed money, then if you cannot pay the lender back, the lender can and will grab your assets. If you cannot afford it, don't buy it.
Posted by:Brenda RockwellJuly 10, 2008 9:38:55 AMRespond ^
Only if they are caught, thats why you'll find an "acceleration clause" in all mortgage loans. This allows the lender to demand immediate repayment if the borrower lied at all in his mortgage application. So even if you have never been late on a payment and have $50,000 in equity, but caught lying they can foreclose.
Posted by:cherry2000July 10, 2008 5:28:52 PMRespond ^
Missing from 2008 timeline
Feb 13, 2008-
Eliot Spitzer's "alleged" liason with escort in DC hotel

Feb 14, 2008
Eliot Spitzer testifies before Congress http://www.ins.state.ny.us/press/2008/p0802141.htm

same day runs editorial in Washington Post titled "Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime: How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy n/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html

March 10, 2008 Spitzer prostitution allegations come out

March 12, 2008 Spitzer resigns
Posted by:PeteJuly 14, 2008 7:57:50 AMRespond ^
Thank you, David Corn, for the "Foreclosure Phil" article. It supports my contention that our government, for one reason or another, is not competent to protect us.

In the '70's it deregulated the banks to protect them from low interest loans. This led to the crisis of high interest rates followed by the Savings & Loan disaster which demonstrated that the crooks had overwhelmed the defenses of sensible regulation and invaded our pocketbooks.

With respect to Sens McCain and Obama we do not really know what is in their minds. Is McCain a closet liberal. Is Obama really an Intelligent Design freak?

Oh, mind reader, show us the way!!!
Posted by:Seymour (Sy) SussmanJuly 14, 2008 12:06:36 PMRespond ^
It may be a noble idea that left to their own devices business will adhere to free market principals. We understand that lack of a referee leads to cheating in almost any game humans play, but cling to an idiotic idea that where mega dollars are part of the game these "business men" will strive to make an honest living. Try playing a tennis match with no judges if each point was worth $1000 -- can you predict what might start to occur?
Posted by:greg zurbayJuly 15, 2008 11:23:59 PMRespond ^
Have watched the career of Barney Frank since he served in the Massachusetts Legislature in the 1970's. He survived a scandal due to his special status as a darling of the progressive left in Massachusetts. He has always been someone who people could look to and say "Well at least we have Barney looking out for us working stiffs.
That the money in politics has corrupted Barney Frank is only slightly less despairing than Abbie Hoffman giving up and taking his own life. Woe is us.
Posted by:Bill O'NeillJuly 29, 2008 12:16:43 AMRespond ^
Why is it that I don't hear more about private mortgage insurance companies being in trouble? This has [uzzled me for a long time.
Posted by:Ed the HeadAugust 1, 2008 3:07:45 PMRespond ^
Readers might be interested in the following links:
http://uneviedematelot.livejournal.com/
Posted by:Russell CavanaghAugust 10, 2008 5:35:16 PMRespond ^
I am sooo glad my home is paid for. I feel so sorry for these people who are loosing their homes. I just hope my 401K & stock portfolio doesn't just disappear.
Posted by:the-old-man-and-the-sheAugust 13, 2008 9:07:15 PMRespond ^
Loved this article! You need to update it though! Would love to see updated events that are going on right now.
Posted by:CBreeze27September 19, 2008 10:04:08 AMRespond ^
i find it interesting there was no mention of supeior bank's role of chicago
owned by the pritzker family, penny pritzker in particular, who now works as obama's campaign finance chair.
Posted by:muadaSeptember 22, 2008 11:59:19 AMRespond ^
Agreeing with you I must also remind you and all others that that's why we label the present practice of "capitalism," PREDATORY capitalism.
Only the "law of the jungle" is appropriate to describe the mess we're in.
As long as we emphasize narcissism and greed, and we de-emphasize critical thinking skills we will never crawl out of that hole.
Basically you are right....with those above caveats.
Posted by:sierraSeptember 27, 2008 11:20:44 AMRespond ^
Wow! nice timeline, but there is so much missing. Nothing about the Community Reinvestment Act,enacted in 1977 under Carter to encourage affordable housing. The law was the mechanism that facilitated Fannie mae and Freddie mac. Changes in the law in the 90s enabled the politicians to set up a complicated pyramid scheme, which is at the core of this economic crisis.
Posted by:bill cSeptember 30, 2008 4:03:37 AMRespond ^
Wow, this has got to be the most one sided timeline I have found on line yet. Most at least give some acknowledgment of the "other side" of this issue, but reading this I see absolutely NO mention of the left's involvement - seriously, Clinton's name isn't even mentioned here prior to this. Partisan "facts" such as this timeline serve nobody.
Posted by:NanaSeptember 30, 2008 3:10:34 PMRespond ^
Nice one-sided story telling. Interesting how Republicans are clearly tagged with party affiliation while Democrats are hardly mentioned and seldom labeled. I knew this was a liberal site before entering but I'd still expect honest "reporting".
Posted by:JeffSeptember 30, 2008 9:14:07 PMRespond ^
This concise overview is powerful and will do more good than the author can possibly ever know. Nomi: Would you be able do a timeline like this for the dismantling of FCC regulations that resulted in the public losing control of their own airwaves?
Posted by:Winston SmithSeptember 30, 2008 11:33:13 PMRespond ^
Good job on this Mother Earth News!

One thing that I think would improve the article: a short table describing relevant legislation (date, name of bill and primary effect on lending regulation)
Posted by:John ErikOctober 3, 2008 1:25:13 PMRespond ^
Interesting. A timeline that does not mention Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Acorn! How about mentioning the Democrats involved: Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Schummer. This is nothing more than an idiot's guide to blaming the Republicans for something that is prmarily the Democrat's "good intentions paving the road to hell".
>
Posted by:SunnstarrOctober 5, 2008 11:35:10 AMRespond ^
Thank you for putting up such a biased, pro-Democratic Party website that attempts to create a timeline in regards to the mortgage crisis. It is good to see yet another shill, or should I say "[deleted]", for the Democratic Party.
Posted by:Joe SeefusOctober 7, 2008 9:36:23 AMRespond ^
Nice broad brush stroke.

Were you able to show that any individual point is incorrect?

I will do a spot check on my own by grabbing one item at random:

"2004: Ameriquest employees give total of $200,000 to Bush campaign; founder Roland Arnall and wife Dawn give more than $5 million to pro-Bush pacs. Arnall later appointed ambassador to Netherlands."

Regarding contributions to Bush campaign, ABC news writes: "Arnall had been one of the top fundraisers for the Bush campaign, raising more than $12 million since 2002. He also contributes heavily to Democrats..."
"http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Politics/story?id=1540722

I did not find an authorative source regarding the $200,000 from employees assertion.

Arnall certainly was ambassador to NL and chair of Ameriquest as per embassy web site: http://thehague.usembassy.gov/former_ambassadors/untitled.html

My spot check tells me that it would have helped to have cited sources for each of the assertions made.
Posted by:John ErikOctober 7, 2008 8:17:29 PMRespond ^
But really, Joe Seafus, should't you be watching Fox? How did you end up on a Mother Jones page?
Posted by:John ErikOctober 7, 2008 8:21:56 PMRespond ^
Reasonable point. Please add information regarding Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Schummer, Freddy, Fanny and Acorn (or at least links to authorative sources). It would be a valuable addition to readers understanding.
Posted by:John ErikOctober 7, 2008 8:27:01 PMRespond ^
FYI, Wikipedia has a timeline relevant to this discussion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeli ne_of_the_United_States_housing_bubble
Posted by:John ErikOctober 7, 2008 8:35:29 PMRespond ^
Sunnstarr suggested that democrats such as Barney Frank should be mentioned. Frank is mentioned (Jan 2 and Sep 14 2007) although perhaps in a less than clearly negative light. It would be interesting to hear from Sunnstarr regarding his points on Frank, Dodd, Schummer, etc.
Posted by:John ErikOctober 7, 2008 8:46:00 PMRespond ^
All this shows is nobody did anything about what was happening. What caused this "crash" was legislation to force banks to lend to people who could not afford to buy homes. Nice to think everyone deserves to own a home, but people need to earn it. Obviously it doesn't work to give people things they haven't earned. Maybe we should remember this leason in upcoming years when the government wants to "GIVE" people anything.
Posted by:FredOctober 9, 2008 5:54:02 PMRespond ^
As an independent trying to understand this crisis, I found your article stunningly biased against Republicans. You do not mention the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, 1992 legilation requiring Fannie and Freddie to devote a percentage of their lending to support affordable housing, and the pooling and selling of loans as securities. Wiki has an accurate timeline here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subprime_crisis_impact_timeline
Posted by:Larry MurphyOctober 15, 2008 5:49:29 AMRespond ^
@ Larry Murphy:

Per this McClatchy News article titled "Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis" at http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html:

(1) Fannie and Freddie don't lend money to minorities or anyone else. They compete with private investment banks to purchase loans from the private lenders who actually underwrite the loans.

(2) Per Federal Reserve Board data, private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers in 2006 and only one of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006 was directly subject to the 1977 CRA housing law.

(3) Only commercial banks and thrifts must follow CRA rules. The investment banks and non-bank lenders who underwrote the majority of the subprime loans were not subject to CRA rules.
Posted by:shorelineOctober 15, 2008 1:16:09 PMRespond ^
This is a good timeline, but as many people have pointed out is one-sided. For another one-sided view from the other side, read the editorial series by IBD at: http://ibdeditorial.com/series11.aspx.

The truth is somewhere in the middle with both Democrats and Republicans at fault. At the end of the day, both had the best intentions for the country in mind, but they just couldn't foresee the problems that would result from their actions.
Posted by:AdamOctober 18, 2008 2:44:10 PMRespond ^
You have it mistaken , President Reagan
was President during the 1980's and
he issued a pile of degregulation
legislation aimed at the Savings and
Loan.
Posted by:ThomasOctober 24, 2008 1:51:43 PMRespond ^
Might want to add the end of the uptick rule to the time line, which the SEC eliminated July 6, 2007. Or maybe that'll be in another installment on the market crash.
Posted by:Vegas Quixote October 25, 2008 4:25:39 PMRespond ^
This is the most biased timeline I've seen to date. It makes no mention or legislation that pushed for the "bending of lending" rules for those who could not pay back (aka "Community Reinvestment Act"), while breaking down the walls within the financial firms (through the repeal of "Glass Steagall"). Guess what, it was during 77, 93, and 1999 that these breakdowns occurred and opened the doors to allow this mess to happen.
Posted by:Scott HesslerNovember 11, 2008 11:52:50 AMRespond ^
Scott Hessler,

The timeline does in fact mention Glass-Steagall. Did you even read it?

To all of the other commenters like Scott who are whining about the why MoJo didn’t include the Community Reinvestment Act, you ought to do some research!!! The CRA is not to blame for financial crisis.

##
Mira Marshall, Chief Compliance Officer for Policy at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.—one of the regulatory agencies responsible for the CRA—said, "We have looked into assertions that the CRA was somehow responsible for the current crisis, and have found that they have no factual basis."

"The CRA statutes require that banks lend prudently. In fact, a Federal Reserve study conducted last year concluded that CRA banks were much less likely to make the higher-priced loans that have sent so many borrowers into foreclosure," Marshall continued.
##


In fact, home foreclosures aren’t to blame for the financial crisis either. It’s the huge unregulated CDS market worth more than $60 trillion (which didn’t even exist a few years ago) that’s caused the crash.

##
Oh, come on. Tell me you're not ashamed to put this gigantic international financial Krakatoa at the feet of a bunch of poor black people who missed their mortgage payments. The CDS market, this market for credit default swaps that was created in 2000 by Phil Gramm's Commodities Future Modernization Act, this is now a $62 trillion market, up from $900 billion in 2000. That's like five times the size of the holdings in the NYSE. And it's all speculation by Wall Street traders. It's a classic bubble/Ponzi scheme. The effort of people like you to pin this whole thing on minorities, when in fact this whole thing has been caused by greedy traders dealing in unregulated markets, is despicable.
##


So, what have we learned today? It’s the CDS market and wealth/income inequality that are the true problems. Let’s not distort the real issues.
Posted by:ClunkerNovember 11, 2008 12:24:29 PMRespond ^
Peel the layers back and look at what got us here. CDS are a result of a pandora's box that was opened through overly liberal legislation. CRA had good intentions but practical ---- please!

Don't fool yourself, it's all connected. You cannot suggest bending the rules for lending thereby increasing level of risk, doesn't result in catastrophe.

For God's sake, read everything but question everything as well. Bottomline, think for yourself and at a minimum have a little common sense.
Posted by:Scott HesslerNovember 13, 2008 5:07:39 PMRespond ^
C'mon Clunker! CRA bent lending rules for to essentially make some in the democratic org look favorable to their constituents.

If you want to quote those who have an obvious agenda, you've lost the credibility you're attempting to gain.

Does CRA have anything to do with the crisis? The sheer spirit in which it was written is perfectly aligned with the crisis we're in!
Posted by:DavidNovember 13, 2008 6:21:06 PMRespond ^
CDS are the problems of today as a result of several acts that were put in place.

Earlier decades legislation put in safeguards (walls) that contained financial activities (aka limiting potential damage/risk) – on the flipside Carter passed legislation (CRA) for credit (bent the rules) to be given those lower income areas. During Clinton admin - CRA legislation was reformed and enforced and provided benefits to lenders to bend the rules for more of these types of loans, and consequences to those who didn’t comply (sort of like a quota system for lending). Also during Clinton’s administration the 1933 banking act legislation that followed the crash, and was put in place to safeguard it from happening again was repealed. Note that Democrats agreed to support the bill after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the anti-redlining Community Reinvestment Act. To suggest CRA is not relevant and the fact that it was left out of this timeline altogether shows further bias and intentional omission.

Bottomline, we encouraged risky lending practices while weakening the structure and safeguards of our lending institutions. Wallstreet seized the opportunity by creating vehicles to legitimize these risks with CDOS and raked in the dough as a result.

It was created by several factors......

- OVERLY IDEALOGICAL legislation (initially well intentioned I'm sure, but not a practical business model for lenders - I'm in the mortgage business and there was nothing prudent about how the rules were stretched)

- FEELING OF ENTITLEMENT and IMPRACTICAL THINKING on behalf of the borrowers to overextend themselves

- LENDERS who have adopted lending policies that create the level of high risk

- OUR GOVERNMENT ON BOTH SIDES that chose to ignore advisors, those who spoke-up out earlier on (even before things were enacted) about the warning signs of what was to likely hit

IT WAS A PERFECT STORM!
Posted by:TodNovember 14, 2008 6:07:48 AMRespond ^
WOW - This is the most Democratic-biased timeline I've read so far. This should be called the Democrat cliff-notes on how to blame Republicans for the financial mess. What I did learn is how the dems are justifying and holding themselves blameless.

I recommend to anyone who reads this - Wikipedia's timeline is the most fact based and allows you to dive for additional factual detail. It may be a bit boring since it doesn't tell anyone how to think but rather provides all information and leaves the decision up to you.

For the more cerebral, I highly recommend it!
Posted by:Susan B.November 14, 2008 6:38:55 AMRespond ^
Scott, David - You guys don't offer any evidence for your unfounded belief that CRA is responsible. This view is so narrow, it's absurd.

I just quoted the CHIEF REGULATOR who says that CRA banks have preformed better than other banks like Country Wide. CRA isn't the culprit.

But go ahead, keep convincing yourself, just don't expect anyone else to believe you.

Yes, CRA banks made some crappy loans - but non CRA banks made even crappier loans.

Then business-friendly politicians like Republican Phil Gramm loosened regulations on how banks managed/insured these crappy loans. The result of Greenspan/Gramm/et al.'s anti-regulation binge was the growth of a massive and speculative market that was completely fabricated out of whole cloth.

If you truly believe that minority foreclosures have brought the entire, huge US economy to its knees, as opposed to a $60 trillion unregulated, speculative, basically black market, than you have some major synapse issues. And you may want to retake Econ 101.

Now, fundamentally the root of this crisis, IMO, is wealth/income inequality. This is what Elizabeth Warren argues. I urge you both to check out her youtube lectures.

But that is another question altogether.

Susan B. - go ahead, trust wikipedia for your financial news. We'll see how well that works out for you.
Posted by:ClunkerNovember 14, 2008 10:14:56 AMRespond ^
Clunker - did you write the timeline?

You seem to be taking the criticisms about its level of bias and lack of objectivity so personally?
Posted by:Scott HesslerNovember 14, 2008 1:09:37 PMRespond ^
Your comedy knows no bounds. I suggest you change career from troll to comedian, a la Carrot Top.

As an American I do take this topic quite personally, as should we all. Look, our economy is tanking and my job is threatened because Bush/Greenspan/Gramm & Co. thought it'd be a great idea to experiment with an $60 trillion, unregulated market. I'm sure they made out just fine, but their mess impacts me directly, so yes this is personal.

We need to figure out what really went wrong in the CDO/CDS markets so that we can make sure never to repeat it.

Blaming CRA and minorities isn't useful. It doesn't get us anywhere because they weren't the underlying problems. As for the Democrats - sure some of them made poor decisions, like Carter. But the pro-business Republicans played a bigger role - that's not bias, that just fact.

I use to believe as you do, at one point. But then (because I take this so personally) I went and did some research. I read what the FDIC was saying about CRA lending practices. Then I compared CRA lending policies to policies at Countrywide, etc.

I wonder, Scott, have you bothered to take the time to do this too? It really doesn't take long.
Posted by:ClunkerNovember 14, 2008 2:01:07 PMRespond ^
Ah - name calling, must have hit a nerve.

Research, Educated - You're views completely mirror that of this timeline. Which is bias and shows very little objectivity.

Nobody has suggested CRA as being entirely at fault. Those are your words.

What is being asked is why CRA has not been mentioned in the timeline as it is relevant and ties to other points in history of relevant legislation. If it wasn't relevant why was it revisited by the Democrats during the repeal of GS.

I agree with you on the swaps, but they are result of events that led to them. To not understand that shows significant short-sight, or just a level of bias that limits how much you will see.

Have fun with your next response, you're quite the writer - you should do it for a living (oops)




Posted by:Scott HesslerNovember 14, 2008 3:35:38 PMRespond ^
Scott, Clunker: I've been reading with interest.

Scott - Do you believe that this crisis would have occurred if the CRA didn't exist?

Clunker - Do you believe that the CRA played no role whatsoever?

Please both of you read this:
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles ?article=did_liberals_cause_the_subprime_crisis
Posted by:BlakeNovember 14, 2008 4:05:42 PMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com

Real Viagra, Cialis Levitra Deal
Dare to compare our competitive prices. Free overnight delivery to new patients in the US. No catch 22!

Bob's Red Mill Organic Flaxseed Meal
In addition to its great nutty flavor, our flaxseed meal is high in fiber and packed with essential Omega-3 Fatty Acids.

PEACEFUL HOLIDAY GIFTS
Items featuring the 1958 peace symbol shirts, buttons, hoodys, signs, stickers, pins...more.
union made • detroit peacebuttons.info

End the genocide in Darfur
Every day, Darfuris face rape, murder, and starvation. Be a Voice for Darfur: tell Obama to end the suffering.
















Citigroup's Collapse

Battery Woes 2....The Empire Strikes Back

Obama's Cabinet

Friday Cat Blogging - 21 November 2008


More MoJo voices...



bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN

Advertise Liberally

This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS