Yes, Republicans Can
News: Lincoln Chafee and other prominent GOPers are lumbering toward the left—but at the grassroots, the "Republicans for Obama" movement has been growing for a while.
|
|
"My grandmother's house is right there behind us," Anne DeCourcy says, pointing past a tall, flower-lined fence to one of the many single-family homes that now crowd the streets of suburban Leesburg, Virginia, about 45 minutes northwest of Washington, DC. "I grew up playing in what was a field right here, but it's not the same; it's very different, and it happened so fast that the people in the rest of Virginia are kind of shell-shocked." Shell-shocked by northern Virginia's explosive growth, yes, but also by the cultural and political transformation that has accompanied it—a transformation that, come November's presidential election, could make itself felt at the national level.
DeCourcy, middle-aged with long blond hair and blue eyes and described to me before we met as a "rabid Republican," has never voted for a Democrat in a presidential election, but this morning she drove in from her home in nearby Lovettsville (pop. 1,160) to tell me why she is supporting Barack Obama. We sit at her friend Joan Tellechea's kitchen table. While Tellechea, a self-described independent, plies me with coffee and fresh banana bread, DeCourcy explains her decision to defect. "I'll vote for anybody who can get more than half the vote," she says. "It's upsetting to me that the country is 50/50. I'm sick of it! And I think a lot of people that lean more conservative feel the same way."
The Obama campaign is counting on it. Virginia, with its 13 electoral votes, is thought to be in play for the first time since 1964, as are other traditionally red states like North Carolina, Missouri, Montana, and Colorado. On the face of it, peeling Republican voters away from John McCain may seem like a stretch for a senator who last year was dubbed "most liberal" by National Journal. (Chris Saxman, McCain's state campaign cochair, has characterized Obama's positions as, "'I don't like guns. I'm going to raise your taxes. I don't like coal.' That's a tough sell in Virginia.") But Obama has made a point of reaching across the partisan divide, targeting the state's moderate Republicans, primarily fiscal conservatives, concentrated in northern counties adjacent to the nation's capital. The almost 2-1 margin by which Obama defeated Hillary Clinton in last February's Virginia Democratic primary was attributed to record turnout among African Americans, but was also augmented by Republicans who took advantage of the state's open system, allowing voters to cast ballots in both primaries; of the 7 percent of Republicans who voted in Virginia's Democratic contest, an estimated 70 percent backed Obama. (McCain prevailed in the state's Republican primary.)
It was no accident, then, that Obama's first campaign stop after clinching the nomination was an amphitheater in northern Virginia—even if in many cases the so-called Obamacans had cast their votes not so much for Obama as against Clinton. That was what DeCourcy originally planned to do. "I was going to do it simply as a spoiler with no idea in the world of voting for him later on," she says. But then, after Obama won in Iowa, she heard his victory speech. "He said, 'We're not red states or blue states; we are the United States,' and I thought, 'Finally, somebody said it!' It literally made me cry. Then again, I'm menopausal." The story reminds Tellechea of her own Obama conversion, which she also experienced while listening to one of his speeches. "I was washing the dishes," she tells me. "The TV was turned this way. I wasn't watching it; I was just listening. All of a sudden, I just got chills all over me, and I started laughing because it was so unexpected. I don't even remember what it was he said."
What exactly the Illinois senator says seems of less importance to many Obamacans than how he says it. According to Steve Robin, a land-use attorney in Leesburg who describes himself as an independent, his conservative friends have been surprisingly open to Obama's candidacy, in large part due to the senator's "distinctive personality" and "the strength of his charisma." "Dyed-in-the-wool Republicans are saying Obama is not that awfully bad," he says.
For Evan Pivonka, the issue is character. A doctoral candidate in political theory who, before enrolling at the University of Virginia, worked for the influential conservative writer Victor Davis Hanson, Pivonka attributes his support for Obama to a "gut feeling." Last fall, his then-girlfriend dragged him to an Obama fundraiser, from which he left "completely blown away." Pivonka explains, "He appeals to me at some level that, even though I can't account for it in terms of issues, I'm going to listen to my gut and support a candidate that is just appealing to me for whatever reason. Whether that's shallow or because he's marketed well, I'm not sure."
Back at Tellechea's kitchen table, DeCourcy lists all the ways she disagrees with Obama, often passionately, on issues like immigration, health care, welfare, and taxes. She also worries about whom he might appoint to the Supreme Court. Still, she prefers him to McCain, who she doubts will be able to break the partisan stalemate in Washington. "If McCain had stood up and given the best speech of his life and had people electrified to vote for him, then I'd vote for him," she explains. "But it just so happens that it was Obama. He has touched something in me and in a whole lot of friends of mine that have never voted for a Democrat and in a lot of people who honestly would never consider voting for a black man. We all feel that something has to change, and now, for the first time, there's the possibility that something can be different."
Just how much difference will the defection of moderate Republicans make in November's election? It's hard to say. According to Larry Sabato, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia, "In presidential elections, you have between 4 and 11 percent of each party regularly defecting to the other side. Think of it the other way: That means 90 percent or more of partisans vote for the candidate of their party." If so, McCain retains more than a fighting chance in Virginia.
"We will be very strong in the rural areas for a long time," then-Virginia gop chairman John H. Hager told the Washington Post last winter. "It's the nascar crowd. It's our crowd." Nevertheless, Virginia has been turning purple in recent years, electing Democrats like Jim Webb to the Senate, and Mark Warner followed by Tim Kaine to the governor's mansion.
In late June, Obama's campaign manager, David Plouffe, told reporters that he expects to put significant effort (read: money) into the fight for states like Virginia, noting that if Obama wins Iowa in addition to the states won by John Kerry in 2004 he could reach the White House by bagging just a couple more medium-size swing states. And, Plouffe added, in purple states like Virginia the campaign will be relying on Republican and independent Obama enthusiasts to proselytize to friends and relatives as part of a "persuasion army."
So DeCourcy and other Virginia Obamacans are not mere political oddities. Whether they realize it or not, they are part of Obama's grand plan for victory.
Bruce Falconer is a reporter in Mother Jones Washington bureau.
Illustration: Mark Matcho

perhaps you will not be so glib and cavalier when talking about the killing of this possible president.
at this point, both parties are guided by the same corporate contributors, he is derided. In 2004, Republicans gave hundreds of thousands to Kerry with no press. See opensecrets.org
I was swept away by Obama when I read his book and learned how, unlike others in the political arena, he lived life. He has experience. He knows what it is to watch families struggle.
It's too bad so many still bring up the race card and don't bring up the class system of the haves and have nots.
Conservative logic:
1.) Abortion is outright murder but huge military spending and massive innocent civilian casulties in political wars is ok, so long as those casulties are 5,000 miles away and not white.
2.) Conservatives are good Christians and the Republican Party is the party of God. They support capitalism which pretty much requires that one has a large collection of uneducated poor workers to keep the gears in motion. Oh, and don't forget their use of that dehumanizing term collateral damage when refering to civilian casulties in a political war. Socialism aims to redistribute wealth to everyone despite their skin color or financial disposition, which is completely exclusive to the tenets of Christianity.
3.)Under the assumption that conservatives probably do more outdoors activities than liberals (I don't see PETA going on fishing and hunting trips), its amazing why liberals are the ones raising hell about environmental issues. Funny how yall want to rape the land for every single resource for profit and not see it as a gift from God...funny that!
ARE YOU SURE that your vote went to the right person that you wish to have as a president ? I'm NOT sure & I don't know about you ! The lesser of two evil ??
Still an evil !I hope I'm wrong but I am sure the only change from Obama or McCain will be their resident address Please watch this video and you'll never think the same way again.
http://video.google.com/videop lay?docid=-7344181953466797353 &q=spin&ei=hsg4SPe5CaSK4wLGh4DeAw
I know some people who live in Virginia and not one of them knows ANYONE who is voteing for obama. When his workers came to the area, they were told to get off property. Oldhabits adn feelings die hard. obama will go back to chicago with his baby mom and wonder, "What happen".
BIll
One must usually be wearing a sheet to hear such enlighten discussion. I live in Virginia and there are a lot of people voting for Obama. I think you are just lying through your tooth.
hppt://www.rollingstone.com/politic s/story/22210615/canadates_for_sale
hppt://www.rollingstone.com/politic s/story/2210615/candidates_for_sale
In the '00s, it looks like 'Obama Republicans'..., Barack collecting up some of the disgruntled Repubs.
What used to be two distinctly different views of government represented by two distinctly different parties has become two "_____ In Name Only" groups, moving closer and closer together until only the hardcore partisans wearing blinders can still make themselves believe there's any substantial difference in the two groups.
Those who're really looking for "CHANGE" that makes a difference have bailed on both the bigs, are are either independent voters, or have gravitated to third parties that reflect their views, such as Libertarians or Greens.
"All of a sudden, I just got chills all over me, and I started laughing because it was so unexpected. I don't even remember what it was he said."
And my favorite:
"He appeals to me at some level that, even though I can't account for it in terms of issues, I'm going to listen to my gut and support a candidate that is just appealing to me for whatever reason. Whether that's shallow or because he's marketed well, I'm not sure."
ARE THESE PEOPLE FOR REAL? What lemmings! How could anyone in their right (or "left") mind support someone without understanding that person's positions and listening to the substance (or lack thereof) of his or her platform? I've never voted for a Republican candidate at the national or state level, but I woke up a couple of months ago, and I find I just have more in common with people who can think for themselves.